Lina Joy V Majlis Agama Islam Wilayah Persejutuan & Ors

Lina Joy v Majlis Agama Islam Wilayah Anor HIGH COURT KUALA LUMPUR ORIGINATING SUMMONS NO R2 2430 OF 2000 FAIZA TAMBY CHIK J 18 APRIL 2001 Constitutional Law Fundamental liberties Right to religious freedom Converting out of Islam Extent of religious freedom to profess a religion of choice Article 111 of. Islam itu bukan sahaja suatu himpunan dogma-dogma dan ritual-ritual tetapi ianya juga suatu cara hidup yang lengkap merangkumi semua bidang aktiviti manusia persendirian dan awam perundangan politik ekonomi sosial budaya moral atau kehakiman etc.

Summary Case Lina Joy Lina Joy Majlis Agama Islam Wilayah Persekutuan Amp Amp Ors Federal Court Facts Amp Amp Court Decision Malay Woman Known As Azalina Binti Studocu

Majlis Agama Islam Wilayah Persekutuan.

Lina joy v majlis agama islam wilayah persejutuan & ors. MAIWP telah ditubuhkan pada 1 feb 1974 bertepatan dengan penetapan Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur. She asserted that she had renounced Islam and embraced Christianity. _abc cc embed.

Case Review Lina Joy V Maiw. Lina joy majlis agama islam wilayah persekutuan ors federal court facts court decision malay woman known as azalina binti jailani applied to the national. Lina Joy v Majlis Agama Islam Wilayah Persekutuan Ors Lina Joy v Majlis Agama Islam Wilayah Persekutuan Ors COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA CIVIL APPEAL NO W0129 OF 2001 GOPAL SRI RAM ABDUL AZIZ MOHAMAD AND ARIFIN ZAKARIA JJCA 19 SEPTEMBER 2005 Administrative Law Exercise of administrative powers Decision or order of National.

We must look at the judgements of other more important and prominent later court judgements including the Court of Appeal case of Meor Atiqulrahman bin Ishak Ors v Fatimah Binti Sihi Ors High Court case of Lina Joy v Majlis Agama Islam Wilayah Persekutuan Federal and Court of Appeal case of Titular Roman Catholic Archbishop of Kuala. Claiming that she had never believed in Islam that since 1990 she had believed fully Christianity and had been attending Mass every Sunday and that on 11 May 1998 she was baptized and exhibiting the certificate of baptism by an originating summons dated 15 May 2000 when she was thirtysix she sought in the High Court certain declarations against the Majlis Agama Islam Wilayah Persekutuan the first defendant and the. MAIWP juga bertanggungjawab ke Labuan dan Putrajaya selepas setiap mengumumkan sebagai Wilayah Persekutuan pada 16 April tahun 1984 dan 1 februari tahun 2001.

LINA JOY v MAJLIS AGAMA ISLAM WILAYAH PERSEKUTUAN. Majlis Agama Islam Wilayah Persekutuan Yang Lain Perayu memfail saman untuk mencabar keputusan KPPN namun samannya ditolak oleh Mahkamah Tinggi atas alasan antara lain bahawa keputusan KPPN atau JPN tidak mencabul hak asasi kebebasan beragama perayu seperti yang dijamin di bawah per. Faculty of syariah and law semester 7 20152016 lab 2013 administration of islamic law in malaysia tlb 18 case review lina joy v majlis agama islam wilayah persekutuan ors 2004 2 mlj 119 name of student.

Majlis Agama Islam Wilayah Persekutuan Yang Lain 2007 1 MLRA 359 the NRD had done the same. Sign up for free. Penghakiman majoriti mahkamah itu telah memutuskan bahawa JPN tidak bersalah dari sudut undang-undang pentadbiran apabila menolak permohonan perayu Lina Joy v.

Copy of LINA J0Y V MAJLIS AGAMA ISLAM WILAYAH PERSEKUTUAN 1pptx By madhankjr Updated. Azlina bte Jailani was born a Muslim. She made applications to change her name and religion.

Case review lina joy v maiw 1. ORS without any reason being given on 11 August 1997. The Lina Joy case sparkled a debate about apostasy in Malaysia and her failed legal attempt to not have her religion assigned as Islam on her identity card is considered a landmark case in Malaysia.

Perayu dalam permohonannya kepada JPN menyatakan adanya kesilapan dalam KPnya dan kesilapan itu ialah agamanya disebut sebagai. April 13 2020 819 am. Madam nawal bt sholehuddin 2.

However she made a second application for name change but this time to Lina Joy on 15 March 1999 lsquo the second applicationrsquo. The same issue was before this court. In that case the main issue was whether the NRD had acted in accordance with law when it rejected Lina Joys request to remove the word Islam from her National Registration Identity Card NRIC.

The cj disagreed and held that lina joys right to profess and practise her religion under art 11 also meant that she had to comply with islamic laws specifically those on conversion out of islam. Lina Joy v Majlis Agama Islam Wilayah Persekutuan Ors. Majlis Agama Islam Wilayah persekutuan adalah undang-undang badan di Malaysia.

In Lina Joy lwn. 300812041718victoria Jayaseele Martin V Majlis Agama Islam Wilayah Persekutuan Anor 2011 9 Mlj 194 Sharia Advocate. Siti nur jannah bt hasanuddin 1122051 name of lecterur.

Majlis Agama Islam Wilayah Persekutuan Ors 2005 4 CLJ 666 di ms 699. THE CJ OPINED INTERESTINGLY THAT SHE WAS NOT PREVENTED FROM MARRYING SO LONG AS THE REQUIREMENTS REGARDING CONVERSION WERE COMPLIED WITH. She wanted to change her name to Lina Joy and remove Islam from her identity card.

Case Study on Apostasy. In accordance with lsquo the. And in the case of Lina Joy v Majlis Agama Islam Wilayah Persekutuan the then Chief Justice Yang Amat Arif Tun Ahmad Fairus said.

The Islamic Legal System In Malaysia University Of Washington

Summary Case Lina Joy Lina Joy Majlis Agama Islam Wilayah Persekutuan Amp Amp Ors Federal Court Facts Amp Amp Court Decision Malay Woman Known As Azalina Binti Studocu